The Key to Strategic Effectiveness? Education, Education, Education!

A colleague from the United States' Army War College wrote this. This is an important issue, possibly the single most important issue, in the development of a strategically coherent and effective military organisation; obviously this follows from the last post, which argued that lethality does not necessarily confer strategic effectiveness. I have reproduced his commentary … Continue reading The Key to Strategic Effectiveness? Education, Education, Education!

Should the SAF sacrifice its investments in military education to cut costs?

This post was inspired by a conversation I had last week with a good friend, who coincidentally happens to be a Reservist (sorry, I hate the term NSMan) LTC in the SAF and a principal staff officer in an infantry brigade. My friend is what I term a "true believer": he believes down to his … Continue reading Should the SAF sacrifice its investments in military education to cut costs?

Making the case for more, not less, discussion and debate within the SAF

Andy Dziengeleski and John McRae argue, on the Modern War Institute, that "it is only through a dialectical approach—a community of professionals engaging in a rational and logical dialogue—that innovative ideas are put forth, challenged, refined or synthesized, and applied." This is something I believe is absolutely needed in any armed forces, particularly in its … Continue reading Making the case for more, not less, discussion and debate within the SAF

The death of the “warrior ethos” and “military professionalism”

This follows from the preceding post regarding the HR McMaster speech. It is further inspired by a recent conversation I had with a former student, who has been working in the defence sector in Singapore for over a decade. This former student was recounting to me a conversation with a 2-star flag officer from another … Continue reading The death of the “warrior ethos” and “military professionalism”

Why study history? A Chinese take on this question

This is a really fascinating piece I read recently, on why the Chinese study the period of their history known as the Warring States period. At one level, there is nothing interesting about this - after all, Stansfield Turner made all staff and students at the Naval War College read Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian … Continue reading Why study history? A Chinese take on this question